skip to main content

Menu

Search

Burnham Brown Partners Defeat Multi-Million Dollar Unfair Competition Claims at Wine Country Trial

Email Page Print Page

Thomas Downey and Robert Bodzin were hired on the eve of trial to defend against claims that their client violated California Business & Professions Code Section 17200 in the operation of a commercial horse boarding facility in Sonoma County. Burnham Brown senior associate David Wilgus was an integral part of the team that prepared this case for trial. Plaintiff alleged that its own horse boarding operations at an adjacent ranch lost millions of dollars in revenue because of the purported competing facility. At the close of the bench trial which lasted almost 2 months, the Court immediately ruled that Burnham Brown's client obtained a defense verdict because Plaintiff's claims that it lost business were contrary to the evidence presented. This ruling followed dismissal of Plaintiff's claim for Intentional Interference with Economic Relations which was thrown out by the Court at the close of Plaintiff's case. Mr. Downey and Mr. Bodzin also successfully defended allegations that their client had defamed Plaintiff's business. Not only did the Court rule that no harm to Plaintiff's reputation was proven, but Mr. Downey and Mr. Bodzin proved that the most significant allegations of defamation were actually true and therefore Plaintiff was not entitled to damages on this part of the claim. Although the Court rejected the multi-million dollar damages claim and refused repeated requests to award punitive damages, the Court allowed Plaintiff to recover approximately $85,000 in general damages, most of which related to a claim for reimbursement for repair and maintenance of a common road.

 

PDF FileView as PDF

Thomas Downey and Robert Bodzin were hired on the eve of trial to defend against claims that their client violated California Business & Professions Code Section 17200 in the operation of a commercial horse boarding facility in Sonoma County. Burnham Brown senior associate David Wilgus was an integral part of the team that prepared this case for trial. Plaintiff alleged that its own horse boarding operations at an adjacent ranch lost millions of dollars in revenue because of the purported competing facility. At the close of the bench trial which lasted almost 2 months, the Court immediately ruled that Burnham Brown's client obtained a defense verdict because Plaintiff's claims that it lost business were contrary to the evidence presented. This ruling followed dismissal of Plaintiff's claim for Intentional Interference with Economic Relations which was thrown out by the Court at the close of Plaintiff's case. Mr. Downey and Mr. Bodzin also successfully defended allegations that their client had defamed Plaintiff's business. Not only did the Court rule that no harm to Plaintiff's reputation was proven, but Mr. Downey and Mr. Bodzin proved that the most significant allegations of defamation were actually true and therefore Plaintiff was not entitled to damages on this part of the claim. Although the Court rejected the multi-million dollar damages claim and refused repeated requests to award punitive damages, the Court allowed Plaintiff to recover approximately $85,000 in general damages, most of which related to a claim for reimbursement for repair and maintenance of a common road.

 

PDF FileView as PDF